Why not support them in doing both? Because we haven't seen them doing . Back up your words. Sony managed things better than EA by not only using a statement, but going after All Lives Issue supporters in remarks, fitting donations by some employees, claiming they will have more in the upcoming week, also supposedly forming a Mut 21 coins studio in San Diego headed by POC developers. They could've either held the announcement until they had something to showtold us what they are planning. In the end of the day if you refuse to acknowledge when a company creates a little step you appreciate then how do they ever learn how to generate a big step you love?
Why are you treating a business such as the way the parent talks about a child? I genuinely do not know why it's our responsibility to baby businesses into getting compassion. Why is it that they need to"learn" to do good for humanity, why can't they simply do it? It is just like white people putting the responsibility on black folks to educate them to not be racist when there's plenty of resources out there on how to perform it. With that said, I really do want to say that I apologize if any of my remark comes off as hostile or attacking to you. I appreciate this discussion much even if I believe at the end of this we'll still disagree. I hope that I'm not creating a strawman out of your argument once I say you see hardly any value in making a statement with nothing to back this up. Whereas when a huge company makes a formal announcement I think that carries a fair bit of weight even if they don't do anything else.
I don't think EA has some moral imperative to do anything at all in this situation, at least not openly. They are not the reason for the problem, it would be simple and appropriate for them to stay quiet or skirt about this political dilemma, but they did not. They had three choices: say nothing, say something, or say something and produce a dramatic gesture. Anything above the bare minimum is well worth acknowledging in my eyes. I don't see it "babying" them to acknowledge a company statement that I agree with. And while we're being antagonistic in such Reddit remarks because that is the prevailing tone of the place, I don't believe anything you have mentioned has come across as disrespectful at all and I hope you feel the same about what I have said.
I'm really glad we managed to have the discussion we did and we're seeing companies place their money where their mouth is. The weekend was rough in my psychological health and perspective on what's gonna get done and probably reached in my comments, and that can still change as the times come and go. But today seeing protests get even larger and more calm than before and seeing companies actually do shit, it gets me a little more hopeful. I expect we see real change. Thank you to get a discussion that in the very least gave me a fresh perspective. I really don't need businesses saying something. In fact I am fed up with companies saying things. Make your merchandise. Make it great. Then shut up and allow actual people speak. No one needs corporations to speak for them.
As it's silly bullshit intended to placate dumb white people who are easily susceptible to this kind of marketing tactic. This marketing strategy where companies express commitments to fight injustice whilst avoiding specifics as to what exactly is wrong, what needs to change, and exactly what they're going to do about it. Every single fucking firm does this and it is empty rhetoric. They do not offer one fuck. This is the same EA that censored the word"Kaepernick" out of a song in multiple games now in an effort to avoid offending their fragile white player base. Individuals catching that and calling it buy mut coins madden 21 out is not nihilism. It's realism. What does saying something accomplish? Why should anyone be happy about E-fucking-A posing the delay of a match reveal as though it's somehow remotely related to the current unrest?